Data as of 27 July 2026

Crisis intelligence

IKRAM case monitor · Case to date (21 Apr - 16 Jul) · 0 scanned, 901 relevant (IKRAM-referencing)

Composite risk score
6.4 / 10
Weighted attribution x valence x reach. Internal composite, not an externally validated index.
Relevant mentions
901
+901 vs prev
Adverse mentions
615
+615 vs prev
Social reach
2,973,696
+2,973,696 vs prev

Case timeline

2026-04-21
Arrests
done
2026-04-22
Remand; IKRAM suspends member; MACC clarifies
done
2026-04-24
Investigation scope widens
done · 24-26 Apr
2026-04-30
Bail and release
done
2026-06-11
Public review
done
2026-07-01
Court proceedings
active · ongoing
TBD
NGO governance policy response
watch
Social mentions
773
News mentions
128
Interactions (social reach)
2,973,696

Blame attribution (individual to national HQ)

LevelMentionsShare of attributed
Individual23239%
Branch11119%
National HQ25543%

Daily sentiment (adverse vs support)

DayAdverseSupportNeutral
2026-04-21113
2026-04-221931276
2026-04-2377632
2026-04-2431625
2026-04-253466
2026-04-26703
2026-04-274421
2026-04-28321
2026-04-29731
2026-04-30100
2026-05-04210
2026-05-06020
2026-05-08021
2026-05-12010
2026-05-13011
2026-05-15003
2026-05-17001
2026-05-19010
2026-05-20010
2026-05-22010
2026-05-23001
2026-05-24022
2026-06-01100
2026-06-08001
2026-06-14001
2026-06-16103015
2026-06-172155
2026-06-181512
2026-06-19100
2026-06-20002
2026-06-22022
2026-06-23021
2026-06-24110
2026-06-256325
2026-06-26020
2026-06-27210
2026-06-28221
2026-06-29122
2026-06-30011
2026-07-01004
2026-07-02103
2026-07-03001
2026-07-04031
2026-07-06100
2026-07-07001
2026-07-08100
2026-07-09011
2026-07-10002
2026-07-13100
2026-07-14002
2026-07-15100
2026-07-16010

Top voices, channels, hashtags

Top voices (by mentions)
Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia50 · 6%
Sinar Harian9 · 1%
Nur Alif Hazmi7 · 1%
NS Returns6 · 1%
Said Imaddudeen6 · 1%
BFM Radio - The Business Station5 · 1%
Channel volume
facebook597 · 66%
tiktok152 · 17%
news128 · 14%
x24 · 3%
Top hashtags
#malaysianegararahmah26
#ikram14
#mahkamah11
#ikrammalaysia9
#sinarharian7
#sprm5

Risks and opportunities

Risks
high Anggota IKRAM didakwa rasuah RM98 juta
Factual court reporting on member corruption charges · 87 mentions
high Siasatan SPRM penyelewangan zakat IKRAM Perlis
Factual SPRM investigation, blamed individuals and branch · 33 mentions
high Siasatan Penyelewengan Dana Zakat IKRAM
Factual law enforcement reporting, individual wrongdoing, institutional response · 36 mentions
high Kes pengubahan wang haram ahli IKRAM
Factual court reporting, blame on individual · 59 mentions
Opportunities
opportunity Himpunan Solidariti Gaza Dataran Merdeka
supportive coverage of multi-NGO Gaza solidarity rally, IKRAM as participant · 3 mentions
opportunity Pemergian Setiausaha Agung Shahrul Aman
community tributes to deceased leader · 4 mentions
opportunity Acara Iftar Kasih Ramadhan IKRAM
supportive community event coverage · 3 mentions
opportunity Kebajikan Islam dalam sejarah
IKRAM leader sharing Islamic religious values · 3 mentions

Ranked public concerns

NarrativeRiskMentions
Anggota IKRAM didakwa rasuah RM98 jutahigh87
Kes pengubahan wang haram ahli IKRAMhigh59
Siasatan Penyelewengan Dana Zakat IKRAMhigh36
Personal names matching Ikrammedium36
Siasatan SPRM penyelewangan zakat IKRAM Perlishigh33
Sepuluh tahun rekod PAN dalam politikmedium27
Pemilihan Kepimpinan Wanita IKRAM 2024-2025opportunity16
IKRAM Maal Hijrah Harmony Dinneropportunity10

Recommended comms sequence

  • P1 Monitor daily for any new mention attributing the underlying alleged conduct directly to Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia at the national_hq level. The current score of 3.7/10 reflects containment at the individual and branch level; a single credible report placing institutional blame at the national body would raise the score materially.
  • P2 Flag the Court of Appeal defamation ruling to the legal affairs team. As a registered society IKRAM now has no standing to bring a defamation suit; alternative protective measures (right-of-reply protocols, formal press statements) should be reviewed in light of this limitation.
  • P3 Prepare and keep ready a factual one-page stakeholder brief that clearly distinguishes IKRAM Hulu Selangor (a district branch) from Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia (the national body), for deployment if media or partner queries begin conflating the two entities.
  • P4 Track the next scheduled court dates for both proceedings (158-count gratification case and 17-count money laundering case) to anticipate volume spikes in coverage and brief the communications team in advance of each hearing day.
  • P5 Note that reach data is missing for almost all mentions today (only one carries a reach figure of 153). Request reach estimation or source-tier proxies from the data pipeline so the next risk computation has a more complete reach-weighted input.

Source links for review

Audience location (confidence-graded)

Coverage: 10 of 216 relevant actors had ANY location signal (5%). Of those, 7 resolve to Malaysia (70% of the 10 with a signal).

Coverage by platform
PlatformRelevant actorsWith locationCoverage
facebook112n/alocation not available on this platform
instagram301033%
tiktok29n/alocation not available on this platform
news2800%
x1700%

Sources: Instagram (post geotags / business address) and X (profile free-text) contribute. TikTok and Facebook expose no reliable per-profile location, so they are marked n/a, not counted as 0%.

Malaysian state (of the 5 actors with a resolved state)
StateActorsShare of resolved
Selangor360%
Penang120%
Kuala Lumpur120%

Confidence: business_address 1, geotag 9. Language mix (relevant mentions): bm 78%, en 12%, mixed 9%. Self-stated, unverified profile data shown in aggregate only, never as fact about any individual. The state breakdown covers only the 5 of 216 relevant actors with a resolvable Malaysian location, not the whole audience.